Friday, 1 June 2012

Court exploring possibilities to let Jagan campaign

                                                                               
The principal court for CBI cases on Thursday explored possibilities to let arrested Kadapa MP Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy resume his election campaign on interim bail up to June 10, the last day, but the proposal was firmly rejected by CBI saying it was not permitted under law. The court will pronounce its verdict on Friday.
On a request by senior Supreme Court lawyer Ranjit Kumar, who appeared for Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy, that the MP be given some relief to campaign on terms of the court, the judge A. Pullaiah enquired whether Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy could be directed to return to the State capital everyday after completing his canvassing.
Mr. Ranjit Kumar replied that it was a difficult proposition because Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy would be campaigning 300 to 500 km away. Instead, he proposed that the MP may be asked to mark his attendance in the local police station wherever he camped overnight.
The judge also enquired whether the MP could be allowed video linkage with masses from jail but this was also not acceptable to the defence as the element of personal contact would be missing.
MLA case cited
CBI counsel Ashok Bhan stoutly opposed any arrangement to permit Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy to access masses saying the latter was not a contesting candidate. Moreover, Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy had made an alternative arrangement to ensure that the campaign was not disrupted, he added.
Mr. Ranjit Kumar referred to the “police station” attendance permitted by the Supreme Court to Sushanta Ghosh, CPI (M) MLA of West Medinipur in West Bengal, while granting him bail in a multiple murder case. He denied the contention of the CBI that Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy would use his status as an MP to tamper evidence if granted bail.
Cases against 412 MPs
He furnished statistics to the court which said that 412 MPs faced criminal cases in the country, including 115 for criminal charges and 73 for serious criminal charges. “All of them had a status. How will Parliament function if they were all to be put in jail?” he said.
Mr. Bhan argued that Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy was not entitled to any concession as a politician because he subverted Constitution by taking away lands of poor people and giving them for a song to corporates which invested in his companies.
He cited the example of ex-RJD MP Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav who was not allowed any concession by court to take oath on election as an MP after he was arrested in a murder case.
from hindu

No comments: